DIR Spatial Accuracy Results

Below is a summary of published DIR spatial accuracy results obtained using some or all of the reference data sets available through this website. Summary statistics are presented on a case-by-case basis, with references to the published works provided below. It should be noted that an explicit comparison of model formulations and/or implementations is not provided, only numerical results of spatial accuracy measurements obtained from the reference landmark datasets. Details of the particular DIR formulations can be found in the provided references.

Please note that the list below is not exhaustive. Investigators are encouraged to submit accepted publications describing their use of the reference data to richard.castillo@utmb.edu, in order to have results included in the postings below.

The format of the summary table is as follows:
Algorithms are identified in the far left column, with reference to the corresponding published work. For each reference data set, errors are reported as the mean (and standard deviation) 3D Euclidean magnitude distance between calculated and reference landmark positions for the set of validation landmarks. When available, magnitude errors are also shown in right-left (RL), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) component directions. All values are reported in units of millimeters.

Additional notes regarding data reporting format:
The error measurements in general are obtained in the "snap-to-voxel" fashion, such that calculated feature positions are rounded to the nearest integer voxel position for comparison against the reference. In this way, measured versus calculated registrations are equivalent for comparison (see reference 4DCTa below for more information). Those results which are not performed in this way are indicated in the references below;

Those results displayed with green background indicate measured errors at the observer uncertainty threshold; Unless otherwise indicated, spatial accuracy results refer to the full list of coordinate pairs for each case.

** Indicates analysis over (n=300) point-pair sets

Table 2. DIR Spatial Accuracy Results - 4DCT
  • 4DCT 1
  • 4DCT 2
  • 4DCT 3
  • 4DCT 4
  • 4DCT 5
  • 4DCT 6
  • 4DCT 7
  • 4DCT 8
  • 4DCT 9
  • 4DCT 10
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 1. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
MLSa 1.58 (1.30) 0.57 (0.63) 0.63 (0.73) 0.84 (1.34)
CCLGb 1.02 (1.03) 0.32 (0.48) 0.34 (0.50) 0.55 (1.05)
COFb 1.17 (1.07) 0.36 (0.51) 0.40 (0.53) 0.65 (1.13)
LCIb 1.21 (1.21) 0.33 (0.51) 0.34 (0.52) 0.80 (1.24)
LIIb 1.40 (1.27) 0.39 (0.55) 0.39 (0.57) 0.96 (1.32)
PFc 1.11 (1.09) not reported not reported not reported
EPFc 1.10 (1.09) not reported not reported not reported
AFc 1.15 (1.11) not reported not reported not reported
DFc 1.19 (1.13) not reported not reported not reported
ADFc 1.11 (1.09) not reported not reported not reported
ICc 1.24 (1.30) not reported not reported not reported
CPPd 1.07 (1.10) 0.32 (0.49) 0.34 (0.51) 0.61 (1.12)
4DLTMd 0.97 (1.02) 0.32 (0.49) 0.34 (0.50) 0.49 (1.01)
LFCe 0.85 (1.00) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 0.98 (1.00) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 0.78 (0.92) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 0.80 (0.92) not reported not reported not reported
KDRi ** 1.03 (0.48) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 0.77 (0.90) 0.28 (0.44) 0.29 (0.46) 0.33 (0.85)
LMPk ** 0.74 (0.90) 0.26 (0.43) 0.27 (0.46) 0.33 (0.84)
SGM3Dl ** 0.76 (0.92) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 0.78 (0.89) 0.28 (0.44) 0.29 (0.47) 0.33 (0.85)
NGF(b)m ** 0.76 (0.89) 0.29 (0.44) 0.29 (0.46) 0.32 (0.83)
pTVn ** 0.79 (0.94) 0.26 (0.43) 0.27 (0.45) 0.39 (0.91)
isoPTVo ** 0.76 (0.90) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 4.01 (2.91) 0.58 (0.62) 0.67 (0.79) 3.68 (3.04)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 2. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
MLSa 1.47 (1.12) 0.60 (0.68) 0.56 (0.72) 0.67 (1.13)
CCLGb 1.29 (1.22) 0.41 (0.59) 0.50 (0.69) 0.70 (1.20)
COFb 1.37 (1.27) 0.40 (0.60) 0.53 (0.70) 0.74 (1.28)
LCIb 1.44 (1.69) 0.36 (0.61) 0.41 (0.66) 0.97 (1.70)
LIIb 1.49 (1.35) 0.55 (0.71) 0.57 (0.74) 0.77 (1.33)
PFc 1.04 (1.15) not reported not reported not reported
EPFc 1.00 (1.15) not reported not reported not reported
AFc 1.05 (1.19) not reported not reported not reported
DFc 1.16 (1.23) not reported not reported not reported
ADFc 1.02 (1.14) not reported not reported not reported
ICc 1.28 (1.62) not reported not reported not reported
CPPd 0.99 (1.12) 0.35 (0.57) 0.36 (0.62) 0.49 (1.02)
4DLTMd 0.86 (1.08) 0.31 (0.55) 0.32 (0.60) 0.38 (0.95)
LFCe 0.74 (0.99) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 0.83 (1.02) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 0.78 (0.92) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 0.77 (0.92) not reported not reported not reported
KDRi ** 1.00 (0.46) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 0.78 (0.89) 0.32 (0.52) 0.29 (0.51) 0.28 (0.78)
LMPk ** 0.78 (0.90) 0.32 (0.52) 0.28 (0.51) 0.28 (0.79)
SGM3Dl ** 0.72 (0.87) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 0.79 (0.90) 0.32 (0.52) 0.30 (0.52) 0.28 (0.79)
NGF(b)m ** 0.80 (0.88) 0.37 (0.55) 0.28 (0.51) 0.26 (0.76)
pTVn ** 0.74 (0.91) 0.29 (0.51) 0.28 (0.51) 0.28 (0.78)
isoPTVo ** 0.77 (0.89) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 4.65 (4.09) 0.72 (0.85) 0.72 (0.88) 4.09 (4.37)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 3. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
MLSa 2.27 (1.40) 0.89 (0.96) 0.94 (0.94) 1.20 (1.47)
PFc 1.36 (1.20) not reported not reported not reported
EPFc 1.32 (1.21) not reported not reported not reported
AFc 1.39 (1.22) not reported not reported not reported
DFc 1.48 (1.21) not reported not reported not reported
ADFc 1.35 (1.20) not reported not reported not reported
ICc 1.42 (1.22) not reported not reported not reported
CPPd 1.23 (1.32) 0.38 (0.59) 0.40 (0.64) 0.73 (1.29)
4DLTMd 1.01 (1.17) 0.37 (0.58) 0.36 (0.61) 0.48 (1.09)
LFCe 0.93 (1.07) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 1.08 (1.15) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 0.93 (1.09) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 0.92 (1.10) not reported not reported not reported
KDRi ** 1.14 (0.61) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 0.93 (1.06) 0.36 (0.56) 0.36 (0.59) 0.41 (0.95)
LMPk ** 0.91 (1.05) 0.34 (0.55) 0.37 (0.59) 0.39 (0.93)
SGM3Dl ** 0.94 (1.07) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 0.93 (1.05) 0.36 (0.55) 0.35 (0.59) 0.41 (0.95)
NGF(b)m ** 0.96 (1.07) 0.36 (0.54) 0.39 (0.63) 0.43 (0.96)
pTVn ** 0.95 (1.09) 0.36 (0.55) 0.35 (0.59) 0.47 (1.00)
isoPTVo ** 0.90 (1.05) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 6.73 (4.21) 1.17 (1.05) 1.28 (1.23) 6.10 (4.49)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 4. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
MLSa 2.50 (1.68) 0.89 (0.87) 1.07 (1.13) 1.41 (1.76)
PFc 2.51 (2.49) not reported not reported not reported
EPFc 2.42 (2.48) not reported not reported not reported
AFc 2.34 (2.19) not reported not reported not reported
DFc 2.59 (2.48) not reported not reported not reported
ADFc 2.27 (2.09) not reported not reported not reported
ICc 3.27 (4.09) not reported not reported not reported
CPPd 1.51 (1.58) 0.52 (0.74) 0.58 (0.80) 0.81 (1.52)
4DLTMd 1.40 (1.57) 0.52 (0.76) 0.54 (0.79) 0.70 (1.48)
LFCe 1.33 (1.51) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 1.45 (1.53) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 1.24 (1.30) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 1.22 (1.24) not reported not reported not reported
KDRi ** 1.37 (0.97) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 1.27 (1.26) 0.47 (0.77) 0.56 (0.65) 0.51 (1.18)
LMPk ** 1.24 (1.25) 0.48 (0.77) 0.55 (0.66) 0.47 (1.16)
SGM3Dl ** 1.24 (1.26) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 1.27 (1.27) 0.49 (0.77) 0.56 (0.66) 0.51 (1.18)
NGF(b)m ** 1.33 (1.29) 0.52 (0.80) 0.54 (0.67) 0.57 (1.21)
pTVn ** 1.21 (1.19) 0.46 (0.75) 0.52 (0.63) 0.47 (1.10)
isoPTVo ** 1.24 (1.29) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 9.42 (4.81) 0.94 (1.21) 1.42 (1.22) 8.98 (5.04)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 5. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
MLSa 2.55 (1.92) 0.90 (1.02) 1.37 (1.60) 1.20 (1.57)
CCLGb 2.50 (1.91) 0.71 (0.81) 1.27 (1.43) 1.31 (1.83)
COFb 2.57 (1.85) 0.77 (0.84) 1.29 (1.42) 1.37 (1.77)
LCIb 3.01 (2.85) 0.78 (0.95) 1.16 (1.47) 2.05 (2.82)
LIIb 3.59 (2.83) 1.21 (1.23) 1.41 (1.53) 2.27 (2.90)
PFc 1.84 (1.74) not reported not reported not reported
EPFc 1.82 (1.87) not reported not reported not reported
AFc 1.81 (1.83) not reported not reported not reported
DFc 1.91 (1.77) not reported not reported not reported
ADFc 1.80 (1.80) not reported not reported not reported
ICc 1.67 (1.57) not reported not reported not reported
CPPd 1.95 (2.02) 0.64 (0.92) 0.69 (0.88) 1.24 (1.96)
4DLTMd 1.67 (1.79) 0.58 (0.82) 0.69 (0.96) 0.92 (1.66)
LFCe 1.14 (1.25) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 1.55 (1.73) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 1.22 (1.43) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 1.21 (1.47) not reported not reported not reported
KDRi ** 1.38 (1.19) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 1.11 (1.46) 0.47 (0.83) 0.47 (0.84) 0.44 (1.15)
LMPk ** 1.17 (1.48) 0.47 (0.82) 0.50 (0.87) 0.49 (1.18)
SGM3Dl ** 1.15 (1.42) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 1.07 (1.46) 0.45 (0.79) 0.48 (0.89) 0.41 (1.13)
NGF(b)m ** 1.18 (1.45) 0.52 (0.78) 0.50 (0.90) 0.46 (1.16)
pTVn ** 1.24 (1.50) 0.50 (0.80) 0.51 (0.90) 0.55 (1.24)
isoPTVo ** 1.12 (1.44) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 7.10 (5.15) 0.86 (0.96) 1.74 (1.66) 6.30 (5.45)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 6. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
CPPd 1.94 (1.72) 0.60 (0.95) 0.59 (0.81) 1.35 (1.62)
4DLTMd 1.58 (1.65) 0.54 (0.93) 0.61 (0.88) 0.93 (1.44)
LFCe 1.04 (1.05) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 1.52 (1.28) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 0.94 (0.99) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 0.90 (1.00) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 0.91 (1.00) 0.34 (0.50) 0.38 (0.52) 0.38 (0.95)
LMPk ** 0.90 (1.00) 0.33 (0.50) 0.38 (0.52) 0.38 (0.95)
SGM3Dl ** 0.90 (0.98) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 0.90 (0.99) 0.37 (0.51) 0.37 (0.52) 0.37 (0.93)
NGF(b)m ** 1.03 (1.04) 0.37 (0.51) 0.42 (0.53) 0.47 (1.04)
pTVn ** 0.96 (1.01) 0.34 (0.48) 0.39 (0.54) 0.44 (0.98)
isoPTVo ** 0.85 (0.89) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRd 11.10 (6.98) 2.15 (1.89) 2.53 (2.10) 10.21 (6.97)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 7. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
CPPd 1.79 (1.46) 0.55 (0.64) 0.68 (0.87) 1.11 (1.49)
4DLTMd 1.46 (1.29) 0.47 (0.61) 0.58 (0.70) 0.82 (1.30)
LFCe 1.03 (1.01) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 1.29 (1.22) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 1.01 (0.96) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 0.98 (1.01) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 0.86 (0.98) 0.37 (0.57) 0.34 (0.54) 0.33 (0.84)
LMPk ** 0.87 (0.97) 0.38 (0.57) 0.35 (0.53) 0.33 (0.85)
SGM3Dl ** 0.89 (0.95) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 0.85 (0.98) 0.37 (0.57) 0.33 (0.54) 0.33 (0.84)
NGF(b)m ** 0.92 (0.93) 0.38 (0.56) 0.44 (0.57) 0.29 (0.80)
pTVn ** 0.97 (0.99) 0.38 (0.56) 0.38 (0.52) 0.42 (0.93)
isoPTVo ** 0.80 (1.28) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRd 11.59 (7.87) 1.28 (1.17) 2.13 (1.54) 10.85 (8.29)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 8. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
CPPd 1.96 (2.33) 0.64 (0.94) 0.71 (1.07) 1.25 (2.19)
4DLTMd 1.77 (2.12) 0.53 (0.82) 0.68 (0.92) 1.08 (2.05)
LFCe 1.11 (1.18) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 1.75 (2.40) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 1.11 (1.28) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 1.16 (1.45) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 1.03 (1.19) 0.37 (0.61) 0.39 (0.57) 0.47 (1.12)
LMPk ** 1.04 (1.18) 0.36 (0.60) 0.39 (0.56) 0.49 (1.13)
SGM3Dl ** 1.13 (1.40) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 1.03 (1.23) 0.36 (0.63) 0.41 (0.68) 0.47 (1.09)
NGF(b)m ** 1.13 (1.15) 0.37 (0.59) 0.46 (0.67) 0.53 (1.08)
pTVn ** 1.17 (1.47) 0.36 (0.60) 0.45 (0.58) 0.60 (1.47)
isoPTVo ** 1.34 (1.93) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRd 15.16 (9.11) 2.29 (1.72) 3.78 (3.25) 13.62 (9.71)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 9. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
CPPd 1.33 (1.17) 0.41 (0.56) 0.59 (0.70) 0.67 (1.17)
4DLTMd 1.19 (1.12) 0.41 (0.57) 0.51 (0.62) 0.57 (1.10)
LFCe 1.04 (1.00) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 1.22 (1.07) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 0.98 (1.00) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 1.00 (0.97) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 0.97 (0.94) 0.35 (0.52) 0.42 (0.55) 0.38 (0.90)
LMPk ** 0.98 (0.96) 0.36 (0.53) 0.42 (0.56) 0.39 (0.91)
SGM3Dl ** 0.91 (0.93) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 0.94 (0.93) 0.35 (0.52) 0.42 (0.56) 0.34 (0.86)
NGF(b)m ** 1.00 (0.96) 0.38 (0.52) 0.44 (0.57) 0.39 (0.91)
pTVn ** 1.03 (1.08) 0.37 (0.52) 0.45 (0.58) 0.41 (1.05)
isoPTVo ** 0.92 (0.94) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRd 7.82 (3.99) 1.25 (1.02) 2.98 (1.93) 6.45 (4.51)
TABLE 2. Case 4DCT 10. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
CPPd 1.84 (1.90) 0.48 (0.66) 0.71 (0.89) 1.21 (1.89)
4DLTMd 1.59 (1.87) 0.45 (0.66) 0.65 (0.96) 0.95 (1.77)
LFCe 1.05 (1.10) not reported not reported not reported
ALKf 1.47 (1.68) not reported not reported not reported
cTVL1g ** 0.94 (1.03) not reported not reported not reported
cEPEh ** 0.99 (1.28) not reported not reported not reported
NLRj ** 0.87 (0.97) 0.28 (0.45) 0.37 (0.51) 0.39 (0.93)
LMPk ** 0.89 (0.99) 0.27 (0.45) 0.36 (0.51) 0.42 (0.95)
SGM3Dl ** 0.83 (0.92) not reported not reported not reported
NGF(a)m ** 0.86 (0.97) 0.27 (0.45) 0.36 (0.52) 0.38 (0.92)
NGF(b)m ** 0.91 (0.99) 0.29 (0.46) 0.41 (0.56) 0.40 (0.94)
pTVn ** 1.00 (1.02) 0.30 (0.46) 0.39 (0.56) 0.49 (1.02)
isoPTVo ** 0.82 (0.89) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRd 7.63 (6.54) 0.93 (0.91) 1.90 (1.91) 6.97 (6.60)

 

Table 3. DIR Spatial Accuracy Results - COPDgene
  • COPD 1
  • COPD 2
  • COPD 3
  • COPD 4
  • COPD 5
  • COPD 6
  • COPD 7
  • COPD 8
  • COPD 9
  • COPD 10
TABLE 3. Case COPD 1. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 1.33 (1.55) 0.42 (0.64) 0.72 (1.24) 0.57 (1.10)
LMPc ** 1.21 (1.46) 0.36 (0.53) 0.60 (0.99) 0.59 (1.23)
MILOd ** 0.93 (0.92) 0.38 (0.47) 0.41 (0.52) 0.37 (0.88)
SGM3De ** 1.22 (2.73) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 1.00 (0.93) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 0.90 (0.93) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.77 (0.75) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.79 (0.85) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 25.90 (11.57) 4.31 (3.19) 23.65 (11.27) 7.39 (5.88)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 2. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 2.34 (2.88) 0.71 (0.97) 1.18 (1.79) 1.35 (2.42)
LMPc ** 1.97 (2.38) 0.71 (0.93) 0.95 (1.38) 1.06 (2.06)
MILOd ** 1.77 (1.92) 0.58 (0.74) 0.98 (1.36) 0.83 (1.58)
SGM3De ** 2.48 (3.79) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 1.62 (1.78) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 1.56 (1.67) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 2.22 (2.94) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 1.46 (2.28) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 21.77 (6.46) 3.31 (2.43) 19.62 (6.80) 6.20 (5.45)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 3. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 1.12 (1.07) 0.42 (0.47) 0.42 (0.50) 0.57 (1.12)
LMPc ** 1.06 (0.96) 0.41 (0.46) 0.41 (0.47) 0.51 (1.01)
MILOd ** 0.99 (0.91) 0.40 (0.48) 0.42 (0.51) 0.39 (0.91)
SGM3De ** 1.01 (0.93) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 1.00 (1.06) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 1.03 (0.99) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.82 (0.80) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.84 (0.82) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 12.29 (6.39) 2.11 (1.67) 6.11 (3.50) 9.70 (6.41)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 4. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 1.54 (1.61) 0.47 (0.54) 0.68 (1.01) 0.87 (1.49)
LMPc ** 1.64 (1.75) 0.49 (0.70) 0.76 (1.16) 0.93 (1.49)
MILOd ** 1.14 (1.04) 0.40 (0.50) 0.50 (0.54) 0.53 (1.06)
SGM3De ** 2.42 (3.56) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 1.08 (1.05) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 0.94 (0.98) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.85 (0.86) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.74 (0.86) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 30.90 (13.49) 5.75 (4.39) 17.67 (10.25) 21.20 (14.75)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 5. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 1.39 (1.38) 0.42 (0.59) 0.71 (0.90) 0.67 (1.25)
LMPc ** 1.46 (1.45) 0.45 (0.59) 0.75 (1.03) 0.71 (1.25)
MILOd ** 1.02 (1.23) 0.34 (0.44) 0.55 (0.93) 0.40 (0.96)
SGM3De ** 1.93 (3.24) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 0.96 (1.13) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 0.85 (0.90) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.77 (0.84) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.71 (0.83) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 30.90 (14.05) 4.46 (3.44) 24.48 (11.31) 15.83 (11.94)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 6. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 2.08 (3.01) 0.61 (0.88) 1.31 (2.69) 0.78 (1.65)
LMPc ** 1.34 (1.65) 0.47 (0.52) 0.61 (0.96) 0.63 (1.53)
MILOd ** 0.99 (1.08) 0.39 (0.46) 0.52 (0.77) 0.33 (0.90)
SGM3De ** 1.45 (2.42) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 1.01 (1.25) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 0.94 (1.12) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.86 (1.92) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.64 (0.80) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 28.32 (9.20) 3.36 (2.49) 24.57 (6.25) 11.71 (9.47)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 7. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 1.10 (1.28) 0.39 (0.43) 0.51 (0.88) 0.47 (1.12)
LMPc ** 1.16 (1.46) 0.40 (0.44) 0.52 (0.99) 0.54 (1.25)
MILOd ** 1.03 (1.08) 0.40 (0.47) 0.52 (0.69) 0.39 (0.97)
SGM3De ** 1.05 (1.43) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 1.05 (1.07) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 0.94 (1.25) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.74 (1.06) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.79 (0.85) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 21.66 (7.66) 3.30 (2.76) 9.26 (5.69) 18.30 (7.51)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 8. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 1.57 (2.08) 0.54 (0.65) 0.80 (1.28) 0.74 (1.81)
LMPc ** 1.54 (2.25) 0.52 (0.58) 0.77 (1.44) 0.78 (1.88)
MILOd ** 1.31 (1.76) 0.53 (0.58) 0.68 (1.21) 0.53 (1.40)
SGM3De ** 1.16 (1.79) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 1.08 (1.24) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 1.12 (1.56) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.81 (1.84) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.77 (0.87) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 25.57 (13.61) 3.68 (2.71) 13.63 (5.98) 18.77 (15.64)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 9. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 0.99 (1.29) 0.36 (0.47) 0.49 (0.99) 0.38 (0.96)
LMPc ** 0.99 (1.32) 0.38 (0.49) 0.52 (1.04) 0.35 (0.94)
MILOd ** 0.86 (1.06) 0.35 (0.46) 0.47 (0.77) 0.24 (0.79)
SGM3De ** 0.81 (0.67) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 0.79 (0.80) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 0.88 (0.98) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.83 (1.22) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.62 (0.66) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 14.84 (10.01) 3.96 (2.73) 7.70 (4.56) 9.92 (10.90)
TABLE 3. Case COPD 10. Show as plot.
Algorithm 3D (SD) RL AP SI
NLRb ** 1.42 (1.44) 0.52 (0.60) 0.63 (0.91) 0.72 (1.32)
LMPc ** 1.39 (1.46) 0.52 (0.63) 0.62 (0.94) 0.68 (1.29)
MILOd ** 1.23 (1.27) 0.54 (0.74) 0.59 (0.80) 0.45 (1.04)
SGM3De ** 1.28 (1.29) not reported not reported not reported
MRFf ** 1.18 (1.31) not reported not reported not reported
meLDDMMg ** 1.17 (1.28) not reported not reported not reported
isoPTVh ** 0.92 (0.85) not reported not reported not reported
DIS-COi ** 0.86 (0.88) not reported not reported not reported
No DIRa 22.48 (10.64) 6.06 (3.97) 7.24 (4.87) 18.88 (11.56)

 

References

4DCT

  1. Castillo R, Castillo E, Guerra R, Johnson VE, McPhail T, Garg AK, Guerrero T. 2009. A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets. Phys Med Biol 54 1849-1870. (PMB Featured Article 2009 - Free Access)

  2. Castillo E, Castillo R, Zhang Y, Guerrero T. 2009. Compressible image registration for thoracic computed tomography images. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering 29 222-233. (JMBE Featured Article 2009 - Free Access)

  3. Gu X, Pan H, Liang Y, Castillo R, Yang D, Choi D, Castiilo E, Majumdar A, Guerrero T, Jiang SB. 2009. Implementation and evaluation of various demons deformable image registration algotihms on a GPU. Phys Med Biol 55 207-219.

  4. Castillo E, Castillo R, Martinez J, Shenoy M, Guerrero T. 2009. Four-dimensional deformable image registration using trajectory modeling. Phys Med Biol 55 305-327.

  5. Castillo E, Castillo R, White B, Rojo J, Guerrero T. 2012. Least median of squares filtering of locally optimal point matches for compressible flow image registration. Phys Med Biol 57 4827-4833.

  6. Hoog Antink CB, Singh T, Singla P, Podgorsak M. 2013. Evaluation of advanced Lukas-Kanade optical flow on thoracic 4D-CT. J Clin Monit Comput 27 (2).

  7. Hermann S and Werner R. TV-L1-based 3D Medical Image Registration with the Census Cost Function. 6th Pacific-Rim Symposium on Image and Video Technology 2013, Guanajuato, Mexico.

  8. Hermann S and Werner R. High Accuracy Optical Flow for 3D Medical Image Registration using the Census Cost Function. 6th Pacific-Rim Symposium on Image and Video Technology 2013, Guanajuato, Mexico.

  9. Muenzing SEA, van Ginneken B, Pluim JPW. Knowledge Driven Regularization of the Deformation Field for PDE Based Non-Rigid Registration Algorithms. in: Medical Image Analysis for the Clinic - A Grand Challenge. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Aug. 2010. (n.b.: floating points used for positional error calculation)

  10. Rühaak J, Heldmann S, Kipshagen T, Fischer B. Highly Accurate Fast Lung CT Registration. SPIE Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA. February 2013.

  11. Polzin T, Rühaak J, Werner R, Strehlow J, Heldmann S, Handels H, Modersitzki J. Combining Automatic Landmark Detection and Variational Methods for Lung CT Registration. Proc. Fifth International MICCAI Workshop on Pulmonary Image Analysis (PIA 2013), Nagoya, Japan. September 2013.

  12. Hermann S. Evaluation of Scan-Line Optimization for 3D Medical Image Registration. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014, Columbus, Ohio, USA. June 2014.

  13. König L and Rühaak J. A fast and accurate parallel algorithm for non-linear image registration using normalized gradient fields. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2014, Beijing, China. April 2014.

  14. Vishnevskiy V, Gass T, Szekely G, Goksel O. Total Variation Regularization of Displacements in Parametric Image Registration. In: Abdominal Imaging. Computational and Clinical Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8676, pp: 211-220. 2014.

  15. Vishnevskiy V, Gass T, Szekely G, Tanner C, Goksel O. Isotropic Total Variation Regularization of Displacements in Parametric Image Registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. DOI 10.1109/TMI.2016.2610583.

COPDgene

  1. Castillo R, Castillo E, Fuentes D, Ahmad M, Wood AM, Ludwig MS, Guerrero T. 2013. A reference dataset for deformable image registration spatial accuracy evaluation using the COPDgene study archive. Phys Med Biol 58 2861-2877.

  2. Rühaak J, Heldmann S, Kipshagen T, Fischer B. Highly Accurate Fast Lung CT Registration. SPIE Medical Imaging 2013: Image Processing, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA. February 2013.

  3. Polzin T, Rühaak J, Werner R, Strehlow J, Heldmann S, Handels H, Modersitzki J. Combining Automatic Landmark Detection and Variational Methods for Lung CT Registration. Proc. Fifth International MICCAI Workshop on Pulmonary Image Analysis (PIA 2013), Nagoya, Japan. September 2013.

  4. Castillo E, Castillo R, Fuentes D, Guerrero T. 2014. Computing Global Minimizers to a Constrained B-spline Image Registration Problem from Optimal L1 Perturbations to Block Match Data. Medical Physics 41 (4).

  5. Hermann S. Evaluation of Scan-Line Optimization for 3D Medical Image Registration. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014, Columbus, Ohio, USA. June 2014.

  6. Heinrich MP, Handels H, Simpson IJA. Estimating Large Lung Motion in COPD Patients by Symmetric Regularised Correspondence Fields. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2015. LNCS Springer 2015.

  7. Polzin T, Niethammer M, Heinrich MP, Handels H, Modersitzki J. Memory Efficient LDDMM for Lung CT. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2016. LNCS Springer 2016.

  8. Vishnevskiy V, Gass T, Szekely G, Tanner C, Goksel O. Isotropic Total Variation Regularization of Displacements in Parametric Image Registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. DOI 10.1109/TMI.2016.2610583.

  9. R├╝haak, J., Polzin, T., Heldmann, S., Simpson, I. J. A., Handels, H., Modersitzki, J., und Heinrich, M. P. Estimation of Large Motion in Lung CT by Integrating Regularized Keypoint Correspondences into Dense Deformable Registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, in press, 2017